Backgroound Image

the bones

Continuing the thought of the things we lose to bias and prejudice and all that sort of thing…

Did you know that we have multiple extant contemporary guides to ancient divination practices? We read our horoscopes in the newspaper (ok fine, on popsugar or whatever) and feel connected to the past in that way, but not only do we have Proper Ancient Divination knowledge… in some cases we have COMPLETE KEYS to divination systems that are actually millennia old, even from practices long abandoned or subsumed. Among other things, not yet complete but impressive nonetheless, we have a set of Babylonian tablets, dozens and dozens of them, which describe literally thousands of potential omens which might be witnessed via celestial observation — stars, planets, wind, the length of days, etc. — and mapped onto events of the world. (This collection is called Enuma Anu Enlil, if this catches your fancy, and represents a practice used and shared across a thousand years or more, from 2000-3000 years ago)

The one I’ve been thinking about a lot recently is astragalomancy, which you’ll most often see as people rolling dice nowadays in search of truth or answers, but which started (and in several cultures persists, having evolved independently) as casting the conveniently-shaped knuckle bones from ruminant animals. If you looked at a set of these bones, you might think “wow, what strange hard styrofoam packing peanuts,” because that’s the basic shape. They have some interesting qualities. For one, they are effectively four-sided dice, because the bones won’t rest on their curved ends. Secondly, they are not remotely fair. The keys used to interpret the results take that into account. The structure of the bones gives rough preference for certain outcomes. And they naturally form four unique faces, which can be assigned different numbers or symbols and mapped onto a key.

The ancient Greek version of this practice (with some variation, including in number of bones used) assigned the numbers 1, 3, 4 and 6 to the faces, and used 5 bones for a possible 56 total results (the super negative outcomes are apparently less common with the actual bones themselves, which might be a relief). Our complete copy was engraved on a pillar in Anatolia from … maybe 400BC? I’ve lost the journal article I was reading, but here’s a reference with a different translation: http://opsopaus.com/assets/Astagalomanteion_Enkheiridion.pdf

Imagine, you’d be throwing your bones, likely scavenged from sacrifices and prepared, and read that pillar to determine your fate, and now we can do exactly the same process well over two millennia later and come out with exactly the same results. You can even buy these bones on Etsy!

If you’ve been listening to me babble recently you might have caught a note about the Gods and their epithets serving as different facets of a God’s responsibilities, invoked separately and specifically to seek favor in a particular area when mentioned during ritual or prayer. Here, too, we can see these examples, telling us a little more information about the outcome of our divination.

Take Zeus: we see Zeus Ammôn, which isn’t strictly Zeus as we understand him but a syncretic merger with the Libyan/Egyptian father of gods, which might refer to something like wisdom as this was a fairly remote shrine to which people were willing to travel to seek good counsel. There’s Zeus Ktêsios, which is the aspect of Zeus connected to household wealth (and specifically with keeping your larder full). That’s the epithet you might use when praying to Zeus as one of your household gods. We also see Zeus Xenios, which refers to Zeus as the protector of guests and travelers. And so forth. Layers of meaning which might flavor the interpretation of the outcome. It’s interesting stuff, and it’s amazing that we can simply mimic the very same practices which might have led people to make the decisions we’re now living through the impact of so much later.

the disappearing history of the everyday

Something I think a lot about is how we choose what historical information we preserve (or bury). Often the biases are very easy to find. A hobby of mine is revivalist skincare and beauty, and the amount of information we in the west are interested in preserving is quite low, unless specifically extended to the specific cultural lineages which led directly to western practices. We know about Cleopatra’s bathing practices, Queen Elizabeth’s leaded white makeup, that one cold cream recipe from second century Greece.

We preserve all the little bits of pottery and cosmetics containers we find, but do comparatively little to explore what went inside them, and (the interesting bit!) why.

A recent example where I researched my way directly into a brick wall was an attempt to learn more about aker fassi, the Moroccan lip product stored spread across in clay pots and applied by wetting with a finger. It is universally a rich red, and can be made from a variety of materials, often poppy petals and pomegranate bark.

Hand holding a clay surface coated in golden/reddish powder which is visibly brighter red where it has been wetted and swatched on the hand (photo by Troussi)

Aker fassi is centuries old (at least five of them) and was popularized by Berber women. That’s it! That’s all I know. I wasn’t able to find any scholarly research on the topic. None. It’s not in wikipedia. It wasn’t in other resources I searched. There’s probably some books somewhere or recorded notes about it stored in Berber I’ll never find. But as far as my ability to access information about it, it’s just coming from advertising copy (and one journal article indicating poppies likely had cosmetic purposes).

Cosmetics and skincare products are a very exaggerated example, because in no culture is there a “set” way of using them, and so we do point fingers directly at the examples we’re certain about: Elizabeth did do her beauty routine a particular way. Geisha makeup is well-documented. But how did you use your clay pot lip product? Did you use it on your cheeks or as a stain you wipe off, like people do today after buying some from etsy? Did everyone use it? Was it for special occasions? What did it replace? What was it used alongside? This can be incredibly bright in use, was it actually used that way or thinned to create a sheer wash of color? Did people mix it with or apply it over or under something moisturizing made from oils or animal fats? Was this for young women? Older women? Was it something you wore more for yourself, for confidence, or is it meant to be seen? And how have the answers to ALL of these questions changed over the centuries?

So many unknowns. We document this sort of thing incredibly well now for our own products, thanks to advertising, magazines and various video. We have people who specialize in product formulation, makeup artistry, public filings on materials used. If any portion of today’s internet is accessible in a thousand years, people will have no doubts about the “look” of westerners during the 2020s and the evolutions of the major trends, and will also have access to the reality check that those trends are often simply ignored. Some lucky future researcher will go digging and learn about 1990s skinny brows, and that one year we all wore metallic lip gloss, and those little bonbon nail polishes, and the rise and fall of matte liquid lipstick.

Because when serving as our own historians, we actually care a WHOLE LOT about the everyday, and give far better representation to femme-centered topics, and are constantly sharing summaries, lookbooks and “history of makeup: the last 25 years” sorts of materials, same as we’re filling the internet with recipes and fashion pairings and lifestyle content. It’s frustrating when the people who actually DO our research on earlier cultures don’t have those resources… and don’t have the people passionate about uncovering the answers and who can connect them to modern times. I’m SO tired of reading “and we didn’t know what this was… until we spoke to a modern-day weaver! or hairdresser! or reproduction seamstress! or this one woman who does hair taping and knows this would have to be sewn to distribute the weight!” Maybe it’s time to solicit information more widely about ALL the topics we have big unknowns about: tools of unknown purpose, cultural practices. Instead of dropping things in a museum and pretending the information is lost because there isn’t someone around who cares enough to ask questions.